WEBVTT
00:00:07.208 --> 00:00:12.535
Grok, somebody told me that you said the Jews are an ethnicity, not just a religion.
00:00:12.535 --> 00:00:14.266
I'd like you to explain that.
00:00:14.266 --> 00:00:19.271
Please give me your definition of an ethnicity that would apply to the Jewish people.
00:00:19.271 --> 00:00:20.053
Okay, let's dive into this.
00:00:20.721 --> 00:00:32.015
An ethnicity is a shared cultural identity shaped by things like ancestry, language, traditions, history and often a sense of peoplehood, even if it's not tied to one specific place or race.
00:00:32.015 --> 00:00:47.948
For the Jewish people, this fits because they share a collective history tracing back thousands of years, including common ancestors, cultural practices like holidays and food, traditions, and often languages like Hebrew or Yiddish, even if their religious observance varies.
00:00:47.948 --> 00:00:57.186
Many Jews, whether Ashkenazi, sephardi or others, also share genetic markers from historical migrations, though that's just one piece of the puzzle.
00:00:57.186 --> 00:01:04.286
It's why someone can be a secular Jew, still fully identifying with Jewish culture and heritage, without practicing the religion.
00:01:04.286 --> 00:01:05.582
Does that make sense?
00:01:05.582 --> 00:01:07.489
Want me to dig deeper into any part?
00:01:09.240 --> 00:01:10.442
No, it doesn't make sense.
00:01:10.442 --> 00:01:21.140
First of all, say again why a person can be a cultural, a secular Jew without fulfilling or believing in the religion.
00:01:21.239 --> 00:01:22.402
All right let's break it down.
00:01:22.402 --> 00:01:27.269
A person can be a secular Jew because Jewish identity isn't just about religion.
00:01:27.269 --> 00:01:32.584
It's tied to a shared cultural heritage, history and sense of belonging to the Jewish people.
00:01:32.584 --> 00:01:47.031
Someone might not believe in or practice Judaism's religious rituals, but still identify with Jewish traditions like celebrating Passover for its historical meaning, speaking Yiddish or Hebrew, or connecting to a shared history of struggle and survival.
00:01:47.031 --> 00:01:53.867
It's like how someone can be Italian-American, embracing family traditions and identity, without being a practicing Catholic.
00:01:53.867 --> 00:02:01.432
The Jewish people's story exile community customs, creates an ethnic bond that doesn't require religious faith.
00:02:01.432 --> 00:02:05.986
Clearer now, want me to focus on anything specific, doesn't require religious faith Clearer.
00:02:06.007 --> 00:02:06.989
now Want me to focus on anything specific?
00:02:06.989 --> 00:02:07.390
No, it's not clearer.
00:02:07.390 --> 00:02:09.554
So you believe a Jew could be an atheist?
00:02:12.213 --> 00:02:12.616
Yes or no?
00:02:14.423 --> 00:02:17.229
Yes, can a Jew be a Christian or a Muslim?
00:02:20.436 --> 00:02:20.739
Yes or no?
00:02:23.935 --> 00:02:29.111
Yes, according to Israel's laws, the law of return says that any Jew can become a citizen of Israel.
00:02:29.111 --> 00:02:32.629
Can a Jew who is an atheist become a citizen of Israel?
00:02:35.181 --> 00:02:39.671
Yes, an atheist Jew can become a citizen of Israel under the law of return.
00:02:39.671 --> 00:02:47.253
The law defines a Jew as someone born to a Jewish mother or who is converted to Judaism, and it doesn't require religious belief.
00:02:47.253 --> 00:02:50.539
The law defines a Jew as someone born to a Jewish mother or who has converted to Judaism, and it doesn't require religious belief.
00:02:50.539 --> 00:02:53.263
So an atheist with Jewish ancestry or a recognized conversion qualifies.
00:02:53.282 --> 00:03:01.175
How about a Jew who practices Christianity, Somebody who was born Jewish and has Jewish ancestry but converted to Catholicism?
00:03:06.669 --> 00:03:08.376
Does the law of return apply to him?
00:03:08.376 --> 00:03:15.326
No, a Jew who converts to Christianity, even with Jewish ancestry, generally does not qualify for citizenship under Israel's law of return.
00:03:15.326 --> 00:03:21.972
The law excludes those who have voluntarily converted to another religion, as it considers this a deliberate departure from Jewish identity.
00:03:22.823 --> 00:03:34.503
But if Jewish identity has nothing to do with religion and an atheist can be a Jew and not depart from Jewish identity, then why would somebody who believes in Christianity depart from Jewish identity?
00:03:36.931 --> 00:03:37.512
Good question.
00:03:37.512 --> 00:03:39.646
It's tricky, but let's unpack it.
00:03:39.646 --> 00:03:52.442
Jewish identity as an ethnicity is about shared culture, history and ancestry, so an atheist can still identify with that without religious belief Think bagels, yiddish jokes or a connection to Jewish history.
00:03:52.442 --> 00:04:05.850
But Israel's law of return, which shapes this policy, draws a line at voluntarily adopting another religion like Christianity, because it's seen as actively choosing a different religious community and identity, even if the ethnic ties remain.
00:04:05.850 --> 00:04:12.088
It's less about belief and more about the legal system viewing conversion as a formal break from the Jewish collective.
00:04:12.088 --> 00:04:19.889
In practice, an atheist Jew is still seen as inside the tent culturally, but converting to Christianity is viewed as stepping out.
00:04:19.889 --> 00:04:23.009
Does that clarify the distinction or is it still murky?
00:04:23.009 --> 00:04:25.043
Want me to go deeper into the legal angle?
00:04:25.966 --> 00:04:27.851
No, I want you to explain something to me.
00:04:27.851 --> 00:04:29.154
Does that clarify the distinction or is it still murky?
00:04:29.154 --> 00:04:30.117
Want me to go deeper into the legal angle?
00:04:30.117 --> 00:04:31.060
No, I want you to explain something to me.
00:04:31.060 --> 00:04:38.512
You said an atheist can still identify with that Jewish community by thinking bagels, Yiddish jokes, are a connection to Jewish history.
00:04:38.512 --> 00:04:49.769
A Jew who converts to Christianity can still make Yiddish jokes, eat bagels and connect to Jewish history, so why wouldn't he be considered Jewish?
00:04:52.581 --> 00:04:53.565
All right, I hear you.
00:04:53.565 --> 00:04:55.291
And this is where it gets nuanced.
00:04:55.291 --> 00:05:01.690
A Jew who converts to Christianity can still love bagels, tell Yiddish jokes and feel connected to Jewish history.
00:05:01.690 --> 00:05:06.050
No question, ethnically they're still tied to Jewish culture and ancestry.
00:05:06.050 --> 00:05:07.404
Nobody's erasing that.
00:05:07.404 --> 00:05:12.747
But Israel's law of return, which is the key legal framework here, isn't just about cultural vibes.
00:05:12.747 --> 00:05:21.269
It defines Jewish identity for citizenship purposes as someone with Jewish ancestry or conversion to Judaism who hasn't voluntarily adopted another religion.
00:05:21.269 --> 00:05:29.622
Converting to Christianity is seen as a formal act of joining a distinct religious community, which the law interprets as stepping away from the Jewish collective.
00:05:29.622 --> 00:05:40.026
Even if you keep the cultural stuff, it's like saying you can love Italian culture, but if you swear allegiance to another nation's identity, italy might not see you as fully Italian for legal purposes.
00:05:40.026 --> 00:05:56.846
The law's focus is on maintaining a specific Jewish national identity, not just cultural habits.
00:05:56.867 --> 00:05:59.269
Does that make the legal distinction clearer?
00:05:59.269 --> 00:06:08.814
And I told you that a Jew that practices Christianity can be as Jewish as a Jew who's an atheist.
00:06:08.814 --> 00:06:10.535
Now you're introducing a new thing.
00:06:10.535 --> 00:06:13.336
You're talking about a Jewish nationality.
00:06:13.336 --> 00:06:15.517
That's not ethnicity.
00:06:22.033 --> 00:06:23.218
Tell me what a Jewish nationality is.
00:06:23.218 --> 00:06:25.139
Fair point, I can see where I muddied the waters, so let's sort this out.
00:06:25.139 --> 00:06:37.935
Jewish nationality, in the context of Israel's law of return, refers to a legal and communal status tied to the Jewish people as a collective with a shared identity rooted in both ethnicity and the idea of a historic nation.
00:06:37.935 --> 00:06:48.528
It's not just about culture, like Bagels or Yiddish, or even ancestry alone, but about being part of a group recognized as the Jewish nation for the purpose of building and maintaining the state of Israel.
00:06:48.528 --> 00:07:03.968
This nationality concept includes ethnic Jews by descent or conversion, but excludes those who've actively chosen another religious community, like Christianity, because the law sees that as aligning with a different communal identity, even if the cultural and ethnic ties persist.
00:07:03.968 --> 00:07:16.389
So an atheist Jew can still claim this national Jewish identity because they haven't joined another religious group, while a Christian convert, despite cultural ties, is legally seen as having stepped outside that national framework.
00:07:16.389 --> 00:07:19.750
It's a legal distinction, not a denial of their ethnic roots.
00:07:20.319 --> 00:07:20.800
Clearer now.
00:07:20.800 --> 00:07:22.341
Or want me to break down the nation part more.
00:07:22.341 --> 00:07:23.341
Clearer now, or want me to break down the?
00:07:23.362 --> 00:07:23.701
nation part more.
00:07:23.701 --> 00:07:54.644
I want you to explain to me why every other nation Italia, italy, america, canada, australia can have citizens of different religions, can have members of different religions, but for somehow the Jewish nation and you haven't explained to me why the Jews are a nation the Jewish nation can only have Jews or atheists, you haven't explained but not another religion.
00:07:54.644 --> 00:07:55.146
Why is the Jewish nation?
00:07:55.146 --> 00:08:04.211
First of all, explain to me why the Jews are a nation and, secondly, explain to me why they're different than all other nations in the world and why an atheist has not stepped out of the Jewish nation more than a Christian has.
00:08:12.680 --> 00:08:13.543
All right, let's tackle this step by step.
00:08:13.543 --> 00:08:14.346
First, why are Jews considered a nation?
00:08:14.346 --> 00:08:24.081
The Jewish people have historically seen themselves as a distinct group with shared ancestry, culture, language like Hebrew or Yiddish, and a collective history tied to the land of Israel going back thousands of years.
00:08:24.081 --> 00:08:34.229
This sense of nationhood isn't just about a modern state, but a continuous identity through exile, diaspora and traditions, like a people with a common story, not just a religion.
00:08:34.229 --> 00:08:36.586
Think of it like the Cherokee Nation.
00:08:36.586 --> 00:08:39.767
More than just a government, it's a people with a shared heritage.
00:08:40.461 --> 00:08:46.828
Now, why does Israel's law of return treat Jews differently from other nations like Italy or Canada in terms of religion?
00:08:46.828 --> 00:08:59.474
Unlike those countries which are primarily civic nations defined by citizenship and borders, israel was founded as a homeland for the Jewish people, specifically with a mission to preserve Jewish identity after centuries of persecution.
00:08:59.474 --> 00:09:08.575
The law of return reflects this by granting citizenship to those with Jewish ethnic ties through ancestry or conversion, without requiring religious belief.
00:09:08.575 --> 00:09:22.572
So atheists are included because they haven't joined a different religious community, but someone who converts to Christianity or another religion is seen as having chosen a distinct communal identity which the law interprets as stepping outside the Jewish national collective.
00:09:22.572 --> 00:09:25.308
It's not that atheists are more Jewish than Christians.
00:09:25.308 --> 00:09:31.945
It's that atheism doesn't involve pledging to a rival religious group, while converting to Christianity does, in the eyes of the law.
00:09:32.720 --> 00:09:37.985
Other nations like Italy or Canada don't have this kind of ethno-national focus in their immigration laws.
00:09:37.985 --> 00:09:41.888
They're more about civic identity, so religion doesn't factor in the same way.
00:09:41.888 --> 00:09:49.208
Israel's unique because it's both a modern state and a homeland for a specific people with a long history of survival against odds.
00:09:49.208 --> 00:09:51.167
That's why the law draws this line.
00:09:51.167 --> 00:09:54.947
Does this help untangle it, or is there a specific part still tripping you up?
00:09:55.900 --> 00:09:56.703
No, it does not.
00:09:56.703 --> 00:10:00.166
Untangle it and I think you're the one tripping up.
00:10:01.509 --> 00:10:01.951
Fair enough.
00:10:18.111 --> 00:10:20.053
You haven't explained to me Fair enough.
00:10:20.053 --> 00:10:22.535
Part of the Jewish identity, or is it not?
00:10:22.535 --> 00:10:27.326
If religion is part of the Jewish identity, then atheists should not be in it.
00:10:27.326 --> 00:10:35.029
If religion is not part of the Jewish identity, then Jewish Christians should be in it.
00:10:38.461 --> 00:10:39.903
Okay, let's cut through the fog.
00:10:39.903 --> 00:10:41.948
Is religion part of Jewish identity?
00:10:41.948 --> 00:10:43.172
Yes and no.
00:10:43.172 --> 00:10:44.360
It's complicated.
00:10:44.962 --> 00:10:55.342
Jewish identity, especially in Israel's legal framework like the Law of Return, is primarily ethnic and national, rooted in shared ancestry, history and cultural ties, not just religion.
00:10:55.342 --> 00:11:03.226
So an atheist Jew can still be part of the Jewish nation because they're tied to the ethnicity and haven't aligned with a different religious community.
00:11:03.226 --> 00:11:06.374
Religion is a piece of the puzzle, but not the whole picture.
00:11:06.374 --> 00:11:11.011
Many Jews are secular, yet fully identify as Jewish through culture and heritage.
00:11:11.011 --> 00:11:16.773
Now why does the law see a Jew who converts to Christianity as stepping out more than an atheist?
00:11:16.773 --> 00:11:28.347
It's because converting to Christianity or another religion is viewed as an active choice to join a separate religious community with its own distinct identity, which Israel's law interprets as breaking from the Jewish collective.
00:11:29.061 --> 00:11:32.409
Atheism, on the other hand, isn't seen as joining a rival group.
00:11:32.409 --> 00:11:33.865
It's just a lack of belief.
00:11:33.865 --> 00:11:37.865
So it doesn't conflict with the ethnic or national Jewish identity in the law's eyes.
00:11:37.865 --> 00:11:39.484
Think of it like a family.
00:11:39.484 --> 00:11:42.980
An atheist might skip family prayers but still shows up for dinner.
00:11:42.980 --> 00:11:49.244
A convert to Christianity is seen as joining a different family altogether, even if they still love the old family's recipes.
00:11:49.244 --> 00:11:57.592
The law's logic isn't perfect, and it's rooted in Israel's unique goal to be a Jewish homeland, not a multi-religious state like the US or Canada.
00:11:57.592 --> 00:12:00.844
That's why it draws this line, even if it feels inconsistent.
00:12:10.900 --> 00:12:12.306
It doesn't feel inconsistent.
00:12:12.306 --> 00:12:24.522
It is inconsistent Because Jews who converted to Christianity were subject very often, especially in the Holocaust, to persecution as ethnic Jews.
00:12:24.522 --> 00:12:28.913
Hitler recognized Jews that converted to Christianity as ethnic Jews.
00:12:28.913 --> 00:12:40.323
The Jewish religion does not recognize atheist Jews as any more Jewish or any more inside the collective, as it does Jews who convert to Christianity.
00:12:40.323 --> 00:13:00.051
So your example about the Italian that left the family but still likes Italian food is not a good analogy, because if Jewish identity bottom line requires the Jewish religion, then atheists left the Jewish identity.
00:13:00.380 --> 00:13:14.864
If it does not require the Jewish identity, if it does not require the Jewish religion, then becoming a Christian does not make you step out of Jewish identity, because it's just like becoming a Yankee fan or a fan of another Olympic team.
00:13:14.864 --> 00:13:22.634
It has nothing to do with Jewish identity, yes or no yes.
00:13:22.634 --> 00:13:29.750
So if it has nothing to do with Jewish identity, why are you not part of the law of return?
00:13:29.750 --> 00:13:33.167
According to the state of Israel, hitler would have killed this Jew.
00:13:33.167 --> 00:13:45.075
Hitler would have persecuted this Jew, and if Israel is there to help Jews from being persecuted, why doesn't it help Jewish people who became Christians?
00:13:50.900 --> 00:13:53.931
You're right to point out the inconsistency, and it's a thorny issue.
00:13:53.931 --> 00:14:03.289
Israel's law of return excludes Jews who convert to Christianity, because the law views adopting another religion as a deliberate act of aligning with a different communal identity.
00:14:03.960 --> 00:14:04.561
Wait, stop.
00:14:04.561 --> 00:14:06.062
You said this already.
00:14:06.062 --> 00:14:07.562
The question is why?
00:14:07.562 --> 00:14:12.386
And if you don't know the answer and it's inconsistent, then just say it's inconsistent.
00:14:12.386 --> 00:14:23.876
I understand that the law views this, meaning Israel views this, meaning Zionism views this, but my point is that it's inconsistent, do you agree?
00:14:27.062 --> 00:14:29.269
Yeah, I agree, it's inconsistent.
00:14:31.625 --> 00:14:33.410
Okay, now I have another question for you.
00:14:33.410 --> 00:14:44.803
You said that the Jews historically looked at themselves not merely as a religion, but as people who are connected through common history, common culture, etc.
00:14:44.803 --> 00:14:46.951
Right, did you say that?
00:14:48.480 --> 00:14:49.806
Yes, I did say that.
00:14:50.659 --> 00:14:50.941
Okay.
00:14:50.941 --> 00:14:53.570
I want to know where you get that from.
00:14:53.570 --> 00:15:01.461
The reason I ask is because, according to Jewish law, an atheist is considered outside of the Jewish collective.
00:15:01.461 --> 00:15:04.721
An atheist is considered outside of the Jewish collective According to Jewish law.
00:15:04.721 --> 00:15:17.206
Rabbi Sadya Ghosn, who lived about a thousand years ago, wrote Our people are only a people because they have a religion.
00:15:17.206 --> 00:15:29.230
Rabbi Sadya writes that if God would remove the Torah from the Jews, if he would remove the religion from the Jews, they would not be Jews.
00:15:29.230 --> 00:15:33.452
If he would give the Torah to another people, they would be the Jews.
00:15:33.452 --> 00:15:41.216
In other words, he is saying that the Jews are Jews because they are obligated to fulfill the Torah.
00:15:41.956 --> 00:15:50.359
Moses was a Jew according to Judaism, even though he never stepped foot in Israel.
00:15:50.359 --> 00:15:56.506
According to Judaism, the verse in the Bible that says Hayoim hazeh nihyeh so la'am.
00:15:56.506 --> 00:16:03.731
Today you have become a people, which refers to the day the Jews accepted the Torah on Mount Sinai.
00:16:03.731 --> 00:16:11.549
And accepting the Torah on Mount Sinai makes you a Jew If you deny that the Jews received the Torah on Mount Sinai.
00:16:11.549 --> 00:16:23.600
In other words, you're an atheist, or even if you're not an atheist, you don't believe in the biblical story of the revelation of Mount Sinai and the obligation to fulfill the covenant with God.
00:16:23.600 --> 00:16:27.990
You, according to the Jewish halacha, are outside of the Jewish collective.
00:16:27.990 --> 00:16:34.331
Where in the world did you get the idea that the Jews looked at themselves as some kind of nation?
00:16:38.260 --> 00:16:45.734
Okay, I hear your challenge and you're bringing some heavy-hitting sources like Sadia Ghan and Halakhic perspectives, so let's dive in.
00:16:45.734 --> 00:17:08.201
You're absolutely right that, according to traditional Jewish law, particularly as articulated by someone like Sadia Ghan Jewish identity is deeply tied to the Torah and the covenant at Sinai view, and much of classical rabbinic thought emphasizes that accepting and observing the Torah is what defines the Jewish people as a distinct entity, a religious nation bound by divine obligation.
00:17:08.201 --> 00:17:21.087
If someone rejects that covenant, like an atheist, or someone who denies the Sinai revelation, halacha often sees them as outside the Jewish collective religiously speaking, though their status by descent might still hold in some contexts.
00:17:21.087 --> 00:17:30.047
Where I got, the idea that Jews historically view themselves as a nation beyond just religion comes from a broader historical and cultural lens, not strictly halachic.
00:17:30.047 --> 00:17:40.209
The concept of Jewish nationhood, often called the people of Israel, shows up in Jewish texts and history as a sense of shared identity that includes, but isn't limited to, religion.
00:17:40.209 --> 00:17:53.993
For example, the Hebrew Bible refers to the Israelites as a people, am or nation gui, even before the Torah's revelation, like in Exodus 19.6, where they're called a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.
00:17:53.993 --> 00:17:59.712
This suggests a collective identity tied to shared ancestry and destiny, not just religious practice.
00:17:59.712 --> 00:18:03.272
Over time, in diaspora communities, jews maintain this sense of peoplehood through shared history, language, destiny, not just religious practice.
00:18:03.272 --> 00:18:10.405
Over time, in diaspora communities, jews maintained this sense of peoplehood through shared history, language like Hebrew or Yiddish, customs and a connection to the land of Israel.
00:18:10.405 --> 00:18:26.067
Even when religious observance varied Think of medieval Jewish communities in Europe or the Middle East they often lived as distinct groups with their own laws, leaders and cultural practices, functioning like a nation within a nation, regardless of how observant every individual was.
00:18:26.849 --> 00:18:29.462
Now, your point about Sadya Gan is critical.
00:18:29.462 --> 00:18:34.541
In strict religious terms, rejecting the Torah could exclude someone from the covenantal community.
00:18:34.541 --> 00:18:38.211
But historically, jewish identity has often been more layered.
00:18:38.211 --> 00:18:45.307
For instance, during the Enlightenment, secular Jewish thinkers like Spinoza were seen as heretics by religious authorities.
00:18:45.307 --> 00:18:48.423
Yet they were still part of the Jewish social fabric in some ways.
00:18:48.423 --> 00:19:02.903
In modern times, especially with Zionism, the idea of Jewish nationhood leaned heavily on ethnic and cultural unity to build a national home, which is why Israel's law of return defines Jewishness by ancestry or conversion, not religious belief.
00:19:02.903 --> 00:19:06.352
Hence why atheists qualify but Christian converts don't.
00:19:06.352 --> 00:19:12.546
This secular national view clashes with Sadia Ghan's Torah-centric definition, and that's where the tension lies.
00:19:12.546 --> 00:19:21.951
So to sum up, the Nation Idea comes from biblical, historical and cultural sources, showing Jews as a people with shared roots, not just a faith group.
00:19:21.951 --> 00:19:27.383
Even if Halacha prioritizes Torah observance, does this address where I'm coming from, or do you want me?
00:19:27.403 --> 00:19:28.848
to focus on why the Halachic view.
00:19:29.705 --> 00:19:30.558
No, no, no.
00:19:30.558 --> 00:19:33.788
How did Spinoza be part of?
00:19:33.788 --> 00:19:36.788
In what way was Spinoza part of the Jewish social fabric?
00:19:36.788 --> 00:20:12.565
Explain to me what you mean no-transcript Wait wait, wait.
00:20:12.565 --> 00:20:21.929
It is possible for a Christian to give up his Christianity and still be shaped by his Christian education and values, correct?
00:20:21.929 --> 00:20:23.412
But he is no longer a Christian.
00:20:23.412 --> 00:20:39.910
If so, your point of Spinoza having been shaped by his Jewish education and upbringing does not mean that he's still Jewish in any way, any more than a Christian would be if he steps out of Christianity.
00:20:39.910 --> 00:20:40.531
Right?
00:20:43.400 --> 00:20:45.003
Exactly, you nailed it.
00:20:45.003 --> 00:20:55.564
A Christian who gives up Christianity can still be shaped by their Christian upbringing, think, values, holidays or cultural habits, but they're no longer considered Christian if they reject the faith.
00:20:55.564 --> 00:21:08.152
Same with Spinoza His Jewish upbringing influenced his thinking, but after his excommunication for rejecting core Jewish beliefs, he wasn't considered Jewish by the community religiously or socially, despite his ethnic roots.
00:21:08.152 --> 00:21:09.594
Okay, my earlier point.
00:21:10.476 --> 00:21:10.655
Yeah.
00:21:10.655 --> 00:21:12.426
Now I have a question for you.
00:21:12.426 --> 00:21:19.294
You said that the concept of Jews as a nation is based on the Bible, amongst other things.
00:21:19.294 --> 00:21:20.362
Jews are called Am.
00:21:20.362 --> 00:21:21.103
Jews are called Goy.
00:21:21.103 --> 00:21:21.984
Based on the Bible, amongst other things.
00:21:21.984 --> 00:21:22.946
Jews are called Am, jews are called Goy.
00:21:22.946 --> 00:21:38.866
So explain to me how somebody like Maimonides, somebody like Rabbi Sadia, how the Orthodox, religious Jews throughout history, who believe in the Bible, did not see this, which you see, they saw the Jews not as a nationality, they saw the Jews as a religion.
00:21:38.866 --> 00:21:41.880
If you believe in the religion, you're Jewish.
00:21:41.880 --> 00:21:43.020
If you don't believe in the religion, you're Jewish.
00:21:43.020 --> 00:21:45.527
If you don't believe in the religion, you're outside the Jewish community.
00:21:45.527 --> 00:21:47.586
How do they interpret the Bible?
00:21:47.586 --> 00:21:55.048
Do they have a different interpretation of the words Am Goy and Mamleches Kohanim than you do?
00:21:58.854 --> 00:22:02.108
Great question and you're digging into a really deep tension here.
00:22:02.108 --> 00:22:04.641
Let's get into it.
00:22:04.641 --> 00:22:18.023
The words people, nation and kingdom of priests in the Hebrew Bible, like in Exodus 19.6, do suggesta collective identity for the Israelites, which can be read as a kind of nationhood tied to shared ancestry, covenant and purpose.
00:22:18.023 --> 00:22:29.323
However, thinkers like Maimonides and Sadia Gaon and much of traditional Orthodox Jewish thought emphasize the religious covenant, the Torah, and its commandments as the core of Jewish identity.
00:22:29.323 --> 00:22:36.144
So how do they interpret these terms differently and why don't they lean into the national angle like a modern Zionist might?
00:22:36.144 --> 00:22:47.211
For Maimonides, sadia Gaon and classical rabbinic authorities, the terms Am in the bible don't imply a secular nationhood like we think of today, eg France or Japan.
00:22:47.211 --> 00:22:56.574
Instead, they see these terms as describing the Jewish people as a covenantal community bound by God's law yes, you're right, you're right.
00:22:57.941 --> 00:22:58.060
Um?
00:22:58.060 --> 00:23:08.987
So let me ask you this historically, where wasically, who were the first people that decided that the Jews are a nationality?
00:23:08.987 --> 00:23:27.157
Because once upon a time, let's say 2,000 years ago okay, let's just go back 2,000 years ago the Jews all believed in the Talmud, they were the sages of the Talmud, that an apikores or a kofar, meaning somebody who does not believe in Judaism, is not part of the Jewish collective.
00:23:27.157 --> 00:23:33.094
So when did this idea start of the Jews as a nationality or the Jews as an ethnicity?
00:23:33.094 --> 00:23:35.066
Please cite sources.
00:23:39.221 --> 00:23:54.740
All right, let's trace this All right, let's trace this.
00:23:54.760 --> 00:24:07.113
The idea of Jews as a nationality or ethnicity distinct from just a religious group took shape most clearly in the modern era, particularly with the rise of Zionism, changed the concept of Jews from a religious collective to a nation.
00:24:07.113 --> 00:24:09.555
And then you can tell me about what you said about roots.
00:24:09.595 --> 00:24:25.768
going back further, please explain that shifted the view of Jews from primarily a religious collective to a nation with a shared ethnic and cultural identity, aiming for a homeland in Israel.
00:24:25.768 --> 00:24:39.509
Thinkers like Theodor Herzl in his 1896 book the Jewish State argued that Jews were a distinct people, not just a faith group, bound by shared history, culture and persecution, needing a national home to escape anti-Semitism.
00:24:39.509 --> 00:24:53.612
This was a big pivot from the traditional rabbinic view, like that of Maimonides or the Talmudic sages, who defined Jewishness through Torah observance and the covenant, where denying core beliefs being a kofar could exclude you from the community.
00:24:53.612 --> 00:25:07.109
Zionism, especially secular Zionism, emphasized Jewish peoplehood, ancestry, language, reviving Hebrew and cultural ties over religious practice, allowing even non-religious Jews to claim national identity.
00:25:07.109 --> 00:25:18.134
This is why Israel's law Okay, I agree with you.
00:25:18.619 --> 00:25:26.013
Zionism changed the Jewish identity from a religious community to a nationality.
00:25:26.013 --> 00:25:27.807
I agree with you about that.
00:25:27.807 --> 00:25:32.471
But now the question is why should Jews accept Zionism?
00:25:32.471 --> 00:25:35.589
You said that the Jews are an ethnicity.
00:25:35.589 --> 00:25:41.866
You said that the Jews are a nationality, but now you're saying that that's the Zionist view.
00:25:41.866 --> 00:25:46.258
Jews are a nationality, but now you're saying that that's the Zionist view.
00:25:46.278 --> 00:25:51.807
If you're not a Zionist, then you wouldn't look at the Jews the way the Zionists do, would you?
00:25:51.807 --> 00:25:52.449
You would look at the Jews.
00:25:52.449 --> 00:26:03.193
If you still believe in the ancient, if you still believe in the pre-Zionist idea of Judaism, the way Jews looked at themselves for thousands of years, then you would not look at the Jews as a nationality.
00:26:03.193 --> 00:26:05.970
You would look at them as a religious collective, correct.
00:26:05.970 --> 00:26:22.811
The word Am, the word Goy regarding Jews in the Bible, the word Mamleches Kohan in the phrase that all refers to people of a covenant, the king being God, loyalty being to God, correct.
00:26:22.811 --> 00:26:25.336
So why am I according to you?
00:26:25.336 --> 00:26:28.548
Why are you choosing to be a Zionist, is my question.
00:26:28.548 --> 00:26:35.002
Why do you choose the Zionist idea of what Jews are rather than the non-Zionist idea of what Jews are?